What If Traditional Procurement Roles Are Holding Your Team Back?

Traditional Procurement Roles

As a Chief Procurement Officer, you grapple daily with complexities that defy conventional playbooks. Tariff policies shift unpredictably, trusted suppliers falter without warning, and emerging technologies disrupt well-established value chains.

Have you noticed that static job roles struggle to keep pace?

When a key supplier’s production grinds to a halt overnight, role-based teams move too slowly, reassigning individuals bound by outdated job descriptions. Your organisation needs answers now, not after a lengthy approval chain. The pressure mounts: stakeholders demand continuous value creation, ethical sourcing, and relentless cost optimisation. Yet, your rigid structure resists the fluid reallocation of talent and know-how.

This tension exposes a deeper truth: the old models of procurement organisation—anchored in stable hierarchies and fixed roles—are eroding under today’s volatile conditions.

When a key supplier’s production grinds
to a halt overnight, does your
procurement team scramble or pivot
seamlessly?

The Case for Rethinking Traditional Procurement Competency Models

Traditional workforce design no longer guarantees the adaptability needed to navigate sudden disruptions. Each new shock underscores the importance of rapidly assembling the right mix of capabilities, not just re-deploying people locked into rigid titles. Conventional approaches leave you behind when competitors pivot at lightning speed, tapping skill sets unbound by departmental silos.

How do you maintain continuity, resilience, and innovation in an environment defined by relentless change? Instead of recycling obsolete methods, we will explore approaches that emphasise skills over roles, enabling you to form agile teams optimised for the challenge at hand.  

From Roles to Results: The Skills-Based Organisation Concept

Ravin Jesuthasan and Tanuj Kapilashrami’s The Skills-Based Organisation (2023) makes a compelling case for abandoning outdated, job-centric models. According to the authors, clinging to static hierarchies in a world defined by fluid markets and rapid technological shifts traps organisations in perpetual catch-up mode. Instead, they propose building talent strategies around discrete, verifiable skills, allowing enterprises to dynamically reconfigure their workforce as conditions change.

This idea resonates powerfully within procurement, where adaptability can spell the difference between thriving and floundering.

Rather than slotting individuals into fixed roles—like “Procurement Manager” or “Category Lead”—imagine a capability-driven ecosystem where you rapidly identify who excels in supplier risk assessment, cost analytics, contract negotiations, or sustainability metrics.

When sudden regulatory changes arise or supply disruptions threaten operations, you don’t waste precious time moving people through bureaucratic chains of command. Instead, you assemble skill-based coalitions designed to neutralise the immediate threat.

Focusing on discrete skills rather than
fixed roles equips organisations to
rapidly reallocate talent.

In practice, a skills-based framework means evaluating and deploying talent much like you would allocate financial capital—investing where returns are highest. This mindset drives strategic outcomes: stronger supplier relationships, faster adaptation to market volatility, and more targeted cost-saving initiatives. It also supports employees by aligning their evolving capabilities with meaningful challenges, enriching their professional growth while maximising organisational resilience.

This transition reframes talent as an active, versatile resource, ensuring your procurement function is always ready to engage, innovate, and deliver results.

Advantages of a Skills-First Approach in Procurement

When procurement moves beyond rigid job titles and taps into discrete capabilities, it gains tangible, strategic advantages. Instead of recruiting a “Procurement Manager” and hoping they fit every challenge, imagine pinpointing the exact skills required to solve a problem at hand.

For instance, a spike in raw material costs might demand deep contract law expertise, supplier innovation scouting, and advanced analytics. With a skills-first model, you build a bespoke team combining these capabilities, slicing through organisational silos to respond faster and more effectively.

With a skills-first model, you don’t just hope your ‘Procurement Manager’ can handle every challenge—you build a team that excels in exactly what you need, when you need it.

This approach aligns seamlessly with key procurement objectives. Resilience improves as you swiftly plug skill gaps, preventing bottlenecks when a supplier fails or a geopolitical shock shifts trade flows.

By matching tasks with the right skills at the right time, you ensure that cost-effectiveness doesn’t hinge on luck, but on targeted expertise continuously optimised for current market conditions.

Moreover, skills-centric strategies foster ethical sourcing. As regulatory landscapes evolve and stakeholder scrutiny intensifies, you’ll want immediate access to specialised knowledge on sustainability standards or responsible sourcing. A skill-based team can integrate these insights from the start, ensuring compliance and bolstering your brand’s reputation.

Finally, the enhanced flexibility embedded in skill-based frameworks strengthens innovation cycles. When new technologies emerge—like AI-driven sourcing platforms—you can swiftly integrate talent with the necessary technical literacy.

This accelerates decision-making, shortens negotiation cycles, and improves supplier relationship management. In the end, a procurement function organised around skills isn’t just more agile—it’s better poised to deliver sustained value in a volatile world.

Real-World Application: Building a Strategic Sourcing Team from Scratch

Step 1: Identify Skills Required

Before initiating a major sourcing event (e.g., selecting a new IT infrastructure supplier), the organisation consults the skill inventory.

Essential capabilities might include:

Step 2: Source the Skills

Starting with zero employees, the organisation taps into external talent marketplaces, procurement consultancies, or specialised agencies. They might contract an independent strategic sourcing consultant with experience in IT categories, a data analyst from a gig platform familiar with procurement analytics, and a project manager from a managed services provider.

Step 3: Select the Team

Shortlisted candidates are vetted against the skill inventory:

  • The strategic sourcing consultant must demonstrate successful past RFX events (Sourcing Event Planning), robust industry intel (Market Intelligence Gathering), and the ability to engage stakeholders.
  • The data analyst must show proven analytical reasoning through past dashboards and spend analytics projects.
  • The project manager must show agile project management credentials, communication clarity, and a track record of delivering complex procurement initiatives on time.

Step 4: Perform the Role

Once onboarded (even temporarily), these individuals work as a fluid team. The data analyst identifies savings opportunities, the consultant builds the sourcing strategy and manages negotiations, and the project manager orchestrates timelines, ensuring a smooth go-to-market process.

The skill inventory guides ongoing role clarity: if a gap emerges (e.g., needing contract implementation expertise), the company can quickly add a contract specialist with compliance monitoring and documentation skills.

Overcoming Challenges: Cultural Shifts and Skills Validation

While the skills-based approach promises greater agility, it isn’t without hurdles. Traditional procurement departments are often built on deeply ingrained hierarchies and familiar career paths—structures employees rely on to make sense of their progression.

Merely cataloguing capabilities doesn’t erase decades of entrenched norms or the comfort employees find in stable, clearly defined roles.

Inevitably, shifting from fixed job descriptions to fluid, skill-driven assignments can spark anxiety. Some procurement professionals may worry about how they fit into this new landscape, slowing adoption and potentially denting morale.

A second challenge lies in accurately assessing and validating skills. Procurement demands a broad array of nuanced competencies—from evaluating supplier risk in frontier markets to orchestrating high-stakes negotiations. Gauging an individual’s true proficiency in these areas can be tricky.

It’s not about listing what people can do—it’s about how well they do it, and how quickly those skills can be deployed.

Although advanced analytics and AI-driven platforms can help identify strengths by examining spend data, contract outcomes, and performance trends, these tools are not infallible. Implementing such technology may be costly and time-consuming, and without careful planning, the organisation could get bogged down in technical glitches or frustrated employees.

Moreover, the search for talent itself isn’t straightforward.

Bridging the Talent Gap: Flexible Sourcing and Internal ‘Core’ Teams

With a skills-based model, you’re often seeking transient capabilities rather than permanent hires. Consulting firms, specialised recruiters, and well-connected interim talent agencies can fill short-term needs, but it’s harder to cultivate a permanent workforce that easily shifts between projects and employers.

Struggling to find full-time staff with the right abilities? Consider a flexible blend of contractors, consultants, and interim managers—guided by a skill inventory—to stay agile.

To address this, a skills-based organisation might blend external experts with an internal “core” team trained to pivot across projects. By adopting flexible talent arrangements—contractors for niche expertise, rotating project assignments for in-house specialists—you maintain adaptability without losing cohesion.

Turning Skills into Results: The Importance of ‘Skills Expression’

Ultimately, it’s not just about listing what people can do—it’s about how they apply those skills to drive meaningful outcomes. This “skills expression” lens emphasises effectiveness over mere possession. Whether it’s securing favorable contract terms, bolstering compliance, or cutting costs sustainably, what matters is how well those capabilities translate into tangible results, ensuring that each skill actively contributes to the procurement function’s strategic goals.

What’s next for the skills-based procurement organisation?

One practical starting point is to begin small. Rather than overhauling your entire procurement organisation, consider launching a targeted pilot project that assembles a team based solely on the skills required to achieve a specific strategic goal. For instance, you might create a cross-functional task force to lead a high-stakes sourcing initiative or supplier consolidation project. Instead of relying on job titles, focus on identifying individuals with expertise in data analytics, negotiation strategy, and supplier relationship management. This low-risk experiment can provide immediate insights into the feasibility and benefits of skills-driven team formation.

To build on this foundation, partner with HR and learning and development teams to conduct a comprehensive skills and knowledge assessment. Comprara’s Skills Gap Analysis Tool can help you map the current capabilities within your procurement function, from market intelligence and advanced contract analysis to ethical sourcing and sustainability expertise. Use these insights to identify skill gaps and align your team’s competencies with evolving procurement priorities and technologies.

Next, design structured learning pathways to support continuous development and reskilling across your team. Comprara’s Academy of Procurement offers a range of solutions, from online courses and targeted workshops to immersive e-Learning modules designed to meet your organisation’s unique needs. With an extensive library of resources and expert-led training sessions, your team can build mastery in essential areas while staying ahead of industry trends.

Finally, integrate feedback loops into your process. Regularly engage your team to assess how the skills-based approach is impacting their work and address any concerns in real time. This ensures that the transition to a skills-based procurement model is both practical and human-centered, fostering sustainable long-term adaptability.

A Future-Focused Procurement Workforce

Adopting a skills-based paradigm isn’t an overnight transformation—it requires thoughtful change management, ongoing measurement, and a commitment to agility.

Comprara’s Capability Assessments and consulting services can guide procurement leaders through this journey, ensuring they are equipped to navigate supply disruptions, regulatory challenges, and stakeholder demands with confidence. A skills-powered approach enables organisations to anticipate challenges, pivot swiftly, and unlock new levels of resilience and strategic value.

This future-focused shift has broader implications.

Moving away from fixed roles opens avenues for employees to contribute based on what they can do, not their place in an outdated hierarchy. Such an environment fosters equity and diversity, inviting fresh perspectives that were previously overlooked because they didn’t fit neat job categories.

Over time, recognising talent at the capability level can help build more inclusive teams, enriching decision-making and strengthening supplier relationships.

As procurement continues to integrate advanced technologies, global networks, and shifting market demands, those who cling to conventional structures risk being outpaced by competitors who harness skill-based fluidity. This new model—dynamic, evidence-driven, and people-centric—is poised to become a hallmark of high-performing procurement functions.

While the journey toward a skill-focused future may be challenging, it promises greater adaptability, empowerment, and strategic contribution, ensuring that CPOs who embrace these principles won’t merely keep up with change, but will lead it.